Re: MikeG


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ WWWBoard: Jack Vance ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Martin G. on July 07, 1999 at 16:42:23:

In Reply to: Re: MikeG posted by Nick on July 07, 1999 at 16:34:04:

Ta muchly for the message, roger base, wilco.

Nick wrote: I am most used to the evolution/creation debates, plus the sokal/leavitt v's Keller/Itigaray war etc

?
? Creation? Ugh. Which god/religion? ugh ugh ugh. Do I understand your post correctly or not (serious question)? Creation debates very uninteresting owing to huge plethora of religions and gods to choose from, and no criteria to judge choice by.
Someone once wrote that at least science comes up with interesting answers as to why it gets it wrong, while religion tends to waffle on and on about mistakes.
All religion act of faith in end, and not open to rationalism; only specific implemetation of one given relgion open to rational debate.
Hope I didn't get you wrong.
Keller/Itigaray war???? Wat dat den? Do tell, please.


Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ WWWBoard: Jack Vance ] [ FAQ ]