Posted by Nick on July 09, 1999 at 06:20:31:
In Reply to: Re: Martin posted by Martin G. on July 07, 1999 at 16:56:14:
: Ta again for explanations.
: By all means, throw in some creationist stuff if you want to; but let me recommend that at least you give it a Vanceian gloss, otherwise you'll get irritated queries as to relevancy from everyone else.
: How much do you want to bet that it can't be refuted? And who will hold the bets?
: I'm gonna love seeing just how you manage to give a Vanceian spin to some creationist agitprop...............
I am not a creationist BTW, I think its bollocks, but they do come up with some underhand approaches which are difficult for the non-scientist to refute.
Once again you have mixed up the message with the messanger, something ppl do regularly on this board.