MIKE G


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ WWWBoard: Jack Vance ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by herbert l radLL on December 09, 1999 at 09:29:45:

In Reply to: Re: MikeG posted by Martin G. on July 07, 1999 at 16:42:23:

: Ta muchly for the message, roger base, wilco.

: Nick wrote: I am most used to the evolution/creation debates, plus the sokal/leavitt v's Keller/Itigaray war etc

: ?
: ? Creation? Ugh. Which god/religion? ugh ugh ugh. Do I understand your post correctly or not (serious question)? Creation debates very uninteresting owing to huge plethora of religions and gods to choose from, and no criteria to judge choice by.
: Someone once wrote that at least science comes up with interesting answers as to why it gets it wrong, while religion tends to waffle on and on about mistakes.
: All religion act of faith in end, and not open to rationalism; only specific implemetation of one given relgion open to rational debate.
: Hope I didn't get you wrong.
: Keller/Itigaray war???? Wat dat den? Do tell, please.




Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ WWWBoard: Jack Vance ] [ FAQ ]