Posted by Martin G. on July 07, 1999 at 16:56:14:
In Reply to: Re: Martin posted by Nick on July 07, 1999 at 16:47:28:
Ta again for explanations.
By all means, throw in some creationist stuff if you want to; but let me recommend that at least you give it a Vanceian gloss, otherwise you'll get irritated queries as to relevancy from everyone else.
How much do you want to bet that it can't be refuted? And who will hold the bets?
I'm gonna love seeing just how you manage to give a Vanceian spin to some creationist agitprop...............