Re: Vance and sensitive subjects - Reality Check


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ WWWBoard: Jack Vance ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Martin G. on July 07, 1999 at 16:29:35:

In Reply to: Re: Vance and sensitive subjects - Reality Check posted by C. Mee on July 06, 1999 at 00:08:51:

C.Mee wrote: You seem to think that anybody who posts a strong or reasoned viewpoint which u don't agree with as a Personal attack and then reply with vitrol. I suspect the Spell of Forlorn Encystment is suitable in this case :)

Tut, tut, C.Mee; I hold with fighting fire with fire. But since in any case active hostilities seem to have died out across the board, rather than go into reasons, I will just note that unfortunately for your hopes for me, Cugel performed an incorrect transposition of a pair of pervulsions, resulting in all of us forlornly encysted being returned to the surface (though blinking heavily in glazed astonishment). Lucky for me!



Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ WWWBoard: Jack Vance ] [ FAQ ]