Re: Vance and sensitive subjects - goodwill - pergaps not


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ WWWBoard: Jack Vance ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Nick on July 05, 1999 at 02:34:29:

In Reply to: Re: Vance and sensitive subjects - goodwill posted by Martin G. on July 04, 1999 at 18:14:06:

: Of course, Nick, should you now be firmly on the side of goodwill, then I could say that I am "sorry...sort of", for pointing out any previous errors...
: Errors which cut short threads of exactly the sort you are now requesting.....
: Perhaps a thinner skin might help?

Ok, I'm not going to win you're good opinion, fair enough.

Am I right in inferring that you don't mind contentious threads as long as the postings are polite and un-ambiguous? Can jokes be included ("...afterall we can't spend all day discussing...").

if you want to mail the reply my address is kokor79@hotmail.com.

(If possible could you clarify you're response to my post dated 4th of July. Are you withdrawing you're accusation that i called someone insane and used political labels as terms of abuse?)

cheers,

Nick

PS. Suldrun's garden? I too am a fan. I'm just not interested in discussing the movie cast for the film. I can't see why this should annoy people who are interested in that topic. The board can surely acomodate a variety of threads.




Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ WWWBoard: Jack Vance ] [ FAQ ]