Re: Re:Plots/Movies


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ WWWBoard: Jack Vance ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Suan Yong on April 08, 1999 at 07:27:15:

In Reply to: Re: Re:Plots/Movies posted by David Pierce on April 07, 1999 at 21:55:16:

David Pierce:
>For the books *are* the films. They are so fine in their present forms
>that there is no good reason to make them into movies. At least no
>participant on this bbs has yet presented a convincing explanation for
>the necessity of making films of Vance stories.

The only reason I might not object to a Vance movie would be for the
publicity - Vance's work remains underappreciated (IMO) by the populace,
and a well-made vance-worthy movie may lead enough people to "read the
book" (movie-books seem to be a trend nowadays) and discover the magic
for themselves.

Aside: as a dabbler in computer graphics here in grad school, I've seen
some pretty amazing stuff. Creating a vancean universe should be a fun
endeavour (I'm imagining the glass towers of Garwiy, among other things).

Suan




Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ WWWBoard: Jack Vance ] [ FAQ ]